Search results

I have went ahead and moved non-engine-specific attributes out of Oreons/assets/prefabs:Oreon*.prefab and into Minions/assets/prefabs:OreonMinions*.prefab. Separating the two works as expected.

Migrated Minions/Carfting/Oreons to latest Terasology/develop branch

Migrating Oreons and Miniions modules to latest build.

In fact, if we are marking these kinds of entities as "Character" (and since it's an engine/Core component, we could do that in the Resources module), then I'm pretty sure that we could automatically assign additional component types, for example, Spawnable, to all components of type Character...

I think it would be better to define these with inheritance. Right now, there seem to be widely different game types being proposed, and putting game logic on the base model will make it harder, or at least more confusing since you have to worry about conflicting components, to share these...

Now that things are coming together on github, should we start providing models sets as pure resources without any extra information about how they will be used? Then provide additional modules to specify usage, along the lines of what LightAndShadow/Resources appears to be doing? For example...

Finished block-selection rewrite.

You put them in the assets directory. assets/animations is where you put .md5anim files. assets/skeletalMesh is where you put .md5mesh files. This is all from looking at what other people have done, and not from actual experience. assets/prefabs is where you'll need some minimal prefab...

I looked at the license again, and you would have to release the module containing the model as CC-by-sa as well, since your derived work must also be CC-by-sa. I would not think that would be an issue, and I think I saw a thread talking earlier about allowing other licenses in modules. I'm...

Here's the newly-improved Color Texture support. I see I need to rebase my commit so it doesn't include everything else, and that I probably need to reformat some code (editor added some empty lines to TerasologyEngine and I likely have tabs in my other files), but I'm out of time for tonight...

There's a version here, but I don't know if it's the most up-to-date: https://github.com/MovingBlocks/Terasology/tree/legacy/blender_addons

Is this what you're looking for? https://github.com/MovingBlocks/Terasology/wiki/Block-Shapes-In-Blender

My mistake. What little I know about "Materials" is based on parsing/generating the .obj/.mat file formats, and the .mat file formats have a color option as well as a texture option from what I remember. Thanks. That makes perfect sense in retrospect. While what I had meant was "a good...

Not realizing that the code was outdated, all I did was get the code to compile and run. So if we want to remove all the classes but CardComponent + CardSystem, there's not much that I've actually done that could be saved.

You're right. If you look at the ColorTexture class, that's exactly how I did it. ColorTexture just encapsulates this behavior, since the actual creation of the TextureData from a Color value isn't trivial for most people. I had forgotten that Materials can specify a texture by color as well...

Block selection now supports picking the color of the block selection renderer (and there's a new programmable ColorTexture class for general use). I still need to pass in the color as part of the render registration event, and then I think this will be ready for general use and integration...

Creative commons is compatible with the ASF license. One of the benefits of using an ASF license is that you can find a legal analysis of the various potential license combinations used with it right here: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html

Unfortunately, JTS is "GNU Library or Lesser General Public License version 2.0 (LGPLv2)", which wouldn't be compatible. Otherwise, I'd say just fork the code and develop it ourselves as a starting point if it wasn't being maintained sufficiently. Vecmath is probably the same issue with the...

Yes, that was exactly my thought. Since so many of the things I'm looking at are waiting for NUI, I figured I'd see what can be done to have "invisible" npc entities just start digging out designated areas, or perhaps computing their own designated areas to perform work in. I only gave the...

While I'm not directly involved with the commons math project, I am more than happy to help anyone who desires get actively involved with the Apache Commons Math project with any guidance they may need. You shouldn't find getting involved there much different than getting involved here. The...